The financial crisis was actually the result on the lack of an effective regulation. There were actually some parts on the financial system that was really hit hard by the crisis and even both the large commercial banks and government-sponsored enterprise failed in preventing such systemic risk or substantial loss to people on a particular financial product.
Under the regulatory system, the amount of such injections have been increased significantly by some weaknesses. Such failures does not only cost taxpayers with big sums of money, but they likewise damaged the financial system's ability in matching savers and borrowers and also on providing risk-sharing and information services.
The improvement on regulations at https://minilateralism.com/ to protect society must focus on revisions as well as on capital requirements, developing rigorous process on bankruptcy in resolving insolvency of complex financial institutions and to reduce the interconnectedness of problems related to credit default swap contracts through the use of clearing-houses and exchanges.
Regulation also plays an essential role for protecting individuals. Economic theories of regulation can possibly stress the need to provide adequate information and on transparency. Also, behavioral economic arguments likewise suggest on the importance of simplicity in consumer investor options. On the recent financial crisis, regulation plays an essential role to greater transparency on the securitization as well as on information on mortgage contracts. Look for more facts about finance at http://www.encyclopedia.com/finance/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/business-financing.
There also are some overarching themes of which links on the regulatory needs on society and for individuals as well. The very first thing is on the need of a regulatory reform to focus on the "too big to fail". It is in fact obvious that the failure on the policy to deal with the exacerbated systemic risk during the time of the financial crisis. The "too big to fail" problems also led to mispricing on risks which gave people a less safe return than what they have bargained for and the disruptions on liquidity harmed the borrowers as well.
The second one would be the economic concern which over-regulation on the financial instruments and institutions lead to cause harm, which obviously is through raising the cost of funds to household and business borrowers as well. A good way to handle this is to design regulations in order to ensure proper pricing on the risks as well as on the information on the risks and that this approach likewise offers the right balance of protection for both individuals and society.
On the consumer protection agency at https://chrisbrummer.org/, it is very important that the prudential supervisor will give its input to the consumer protection body about the impacts of the regulatory actions on the safety and the soundness of financial systems and that conflicts between supervisory and consumer body should be handled and resolved by the treasury.